| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Kill Rights problem and suggestion - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
SB Rico wrote: Hang on a second, so what this breaks down to is you don't get killrights as easily as you used to... That means you can kill more people yourself without the same worry, since they won't be able to pay you back ... What wo...
- by space ganelon - at 2013.01.02 22:52:00
|
2. Kill Rights problem and suggestion - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
LOL, my fave replies are that I'm whining because of the way that my avatar looks and that I look like an old Chribba. Anyhow, 1/6 approaches (30 days after KR change), and I am guessing the total number of KRs in existance are rapidly declining. ...
- by space ganelon - at 2013.01.02 19:31:00
|
3. Kill Rights problem and suggestion - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Garviel Tarrant wrote: space ganelon wrote: I think being made a "suspect" when killrights get activated is too much. HTFU you left out context. this is mainly because i don't want you whoring on my kill. whatever H is...
- by space ganelon - at 2012.12.11 20:33:00
|
4. So, have we seen the end of the EvE pirate? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Wow, i never knew there were such strict definitions and protocols. All I can say is.... yarrrrr!
- by space ganelon - at 2012.12.11 07:02:00
|
5. Bounty hunter profession. Kill rights fix - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Strongly agree in principle - hunting is a cool piece of the sandbox. Put yourselves, CCP, in the mindset of the hunter/killer and think cool thoughts.
- by space ganelon - at 2012.12.11 04:04:00
|
6. Kill Rights problem and suggestion - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
I mentioned all this before in dev blog response, but I want to try one more time. I think killrights are a cool part of the game, and I really really like to ability to "purchase" killrights on someone. That said, I think the changes to killrig...
- by space ganelon - at 2012.12.11 04:01:00
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: The Retribution of Team Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
What you guys are all missing is that the new KR mechanism makes it so anyone who gets a KR anymore will probably *enjoy* someone having KR on them. PvPer attitude to more potential PvP is "bring it, baby!" not "OMG! must shed KR before someone vi...
- by space ganelon - at 2012.10.12 20:47:00
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: The Retribution of Team Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I've really tried to be positive, but the more I think about it the more the new bounty system seems pointless. The devs are clearly between a rock and a hard place on bounties - pay too much, suicide collection nullifies the bounty. Pay too litt...
- by space ganelon - at 2012.10.12 18:46:00
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: The Retribution of Team Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: space ganelon wrote: Why not say any lowsec ship aggression that generates a Suspect flag grants a KR? please? :) This is good..... although it means infinite lowsec killrights... To explain: I find a person wi...
- by space ganelon - at 2012.10.12 18:21:00
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: The Retribution of Team Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
"Kill Rights will now be created at the same time a Criminal flag is put on a player, but only for attacking in hi sec or podding in low sec" I love the idea of being able to "rent" kill rights, tho I would prefer it to start a Limited Engagement...
- by space ganelon - at 2012.10.12 17:50:00
|
11. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
never mind, nothing to see
- by space ganelon - at 2012.03.07 17:46:00
|
12. Christmas gifts - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sort of agree with Floppie - I'm not whining about not getting to choose gift because, as stated, it is a gift, after all. However, I sincerely hope whatever mechanism they used is not used again to disseminate something actually important. I read...
- by space ganelon - at 2011.12.22 17:37:00
|
13. EVE Online: Incursion 1.6 to be deployed on Tuesday, May 31 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP, take as long as you need. Just please fix it so that when someone logs out, they're online indicator switches to "offline". One little correctly filled in red square, that's all I ask. Not even very many pixels, and it does not need to be ren...
- by space ganelon - at 2011.05.31 16:47:00
|
14. [Proposal] (long) rebalance 0.0 and lowsec ratting - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Not sure about the specific mechanisms proposed for making low/null-sec more profitable, but I certainlly have been annoyed lately by how much more ISK I can making doing hisec L4s than nullseccing. "boredom pays" is not a great game mechanic. S...
- by space ganelon - at 2009.08.05 23:54:00
|
15. [Proposal] Lose T2 BPOs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
OK, I'm back on this with another thought... Why are invented BPC's so crappy by default??? -4, -4 that is. If invented BPCs were not so sucky in their default ME, I'd have no issue with the BPOs at all. 0,0 for invented BPCs would be fine, with t...
- by space ganelon - at 2009.08.05 18:29:00
|
16. [Proposal] Lose T2 BPOs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
OK, so maybe I over-generalized from a few point-cases... I'll keep filling out the spreadsheet with more items and see where that takes us. (Yes, the spreadsheet precedes any actual building, to whoever poo-poo-ed me for not doing mkt research) T...
- by space ganelon - at 2009.08.04 08:40:00
|
17. [Proposal] Lose T2 BPOs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: darius mclever oh please not again. honestly, that's about what i was expecting. so, sorry again if nothing new. hm, the claim that "T2 BPOs cannot account for .05% of the volume" seems flatly wrong, T2 ship volume is n...
- by space ganelon - at 2009.08.03 21:46:00
|
18. [Proposal] Lose T2 BPOs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: De'Veldrin And before the thread has been successfully derailed into an "X has value regardless of how you obtained it" thread, let's go back to the topic at hand. Yes, thanks. Let's try to reframe this without worrying ...
- by space ganelon - at 2009.08.03 20:27:00
|
19. [Proposal] Lose T2 BPOs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Information Broker and t2's take years to regain cost of t2 unless you've held since ... sure, i never said T2 BPOs were a great deal to buy, else i'd just go buy one. but they remain out there depressing prices, indepen...
- by space ganelon - at 2009.08.03 19:26:00
|
20. [Proposal] Lose T2 BPOs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The math is simple - there is no way for invented BPC users to successfully compete with T2 BPOs researched to 30,30. Having the lottery for getting T2 BPOs and then just ending it is one thing, but pretending invention makes up for it and leaving...
- by space ganelon - at 2009.08.03 19:09:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |